A Simple Key For h4831sc load data Unveiled
A Simple Key For h4831sc load data Unveiled
Blog Article
I'm a real fan of your H4831 powder. I get excellent velocity and precision outside of any caliber I have attempted it in. In the twenty five-06 up into the 338 it's my head over to powder of choice. I try all sorts of powders when Performing up loads, but the H4831 often seems to appear out on best for accuracy and velocity when the case is on the 06 course or bigger.
Obviously, the Hodgdon tech wouldn't endorse my mixing of various large amount numbers, but I feel I realize why. It's a litigation-driven world, and some idiot would absolutely deduce that he could mix H380 and H110 and think of his own custom made blend of powder. What a entire world.
Can they be interchanged without having anxieties other then employing typical load procedures when switching from great deal to lot?
Operate your load up with the precise powder (sc or common) and whole lot you might be using nevertheless. Similar burn up fee doesn't mean it'll behave "exactly" the exact same. I've found in excess of one hundred fps difference between sc and mil-surp many H4831.
Yup or it will not operate nicely. And For the reason that OP provides a load applying Varget I'd try to discover an individual to trade with. Could come up with a get acquire condition.
Apache Jct Superior data, I have jars of the two and often questioned if they could be reloaded with the same recipes must I operate out of one or the other.
If there is no load data it really is mainly because this powder is not well suited for this cartridge. Commonly a person will likely not discover one powder to suit all cartridges, plus the loved ones of cartridges with the particular powder (4831SC) that you will be asking about would not operate.
Like mentioned over, exact same stuff. All of that differs is the size of the kernels. I did hear someplace that they're going to only make the SC Later on. I don't know if that is definitely accurate or not but would sound right to me. I exploit SC since that is definitely what I found in the 8 lb jug and it works.
The primary reason I switched from IMR 4831 to H4831 was to make the most of the temperature insensitivity of the Hodgdon Intense powder.
It also goes on to claim that due to the fshorter h4831sc grains, that load density may be a little bit increased.
Regardless of the similarity in nomenclature, They are wholly various powders, with IMR 4831 getting considerably more rapidly in comparison to the Hodgdon variants. You should not address them as the same powder, because they most absolutely are certainly not.
It is most likely that no further dialogue is required, in which circumstance we advocate starting up a whole new thread. If even so you're feeling your reaction is needed you can continue to do this.
rayporter claimed: i under no circumstances found a change in addition to the frequent is like rolling cordwood on to the the h4831sc load data pan. Click on to increase...
This looks as if an excellent destination to divulge somewhat more info on Hodgdon, H4831 specially...I as soon as had a pound of H4831SC sit over the shelf h4831 vs h4831sc for several decades. It was ordered before Hodgdon started publicizing the "Serious" line of powders, of which the H4831s are a part.